If you were injured in a Colorado Springs rear-end collision, you may have a personal injury claim against the driver or other party whose negligence caused the crash.
Rear-end collision cases can involve medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, vehicle damage, and other documented losses, particularly when car accident victims suffer serious injuries that require ongoing treatment or time away from work.
The rear driver is often responsible because Colorado law requires motorists to maintain a reasonable and prudent following distance, but fault is not automatic.
Insurance companies may examine traffic conditions, vehicle movements, photographs, video, witness statements, road conditions, and other evidence before accepting liability.
Springs Law Group can investigate the collision, identify available insurance coverage, document the injuries and financial losses, and pursue compensation through settlement or litigation when necessary.
When a rear-end collision occurs, the driver in the rear is often suspected of following too closely, failing to maintain a proper lookout, or braking too late.
Colorado law requires motorists to maintain a reasonable and prudent following distance based on speed, traffic, and road conditions, but the driver’s responsibility for a crash still depends on the facts.
An unsafe lane change, sudden reverse movement, mechanical failure, chain-reaction impact, or another driver’s conduct can affect how fault is assigned.
Rear-end crashes can also cause a wide range of injuries. Even a minor rear-end collision may produce symptoms that are not immediately apparent, while higher-force crashes can cause severe injuries requiring extensive medical treatment.
Common injuries include whiplash, other soft tissue damage, back injuries, head injuries, concussions, fractures, nerve injuries, and aggravation of preexisting neck or spinal conditions.
Symptoms such as pain, stiffness, headaches, dizziness, numbness, or reduced range of motion may develop hours or days after the crash.
Evidence often determines whether an injured person can establish negligence and connect the collision to the resulting injuries.
Photographs, witness statements, traffic-camera or dash-camera footage, vehicle data, medical records, and cellphone records may help establish whether distracted driving, reckless driving, excessive speed, or another unsafe act caused the impact.
Medical documentation can also help distinguish a new injury or aggravation from a preexisting condition.
A personal injury lawyer can investigate the collision, preserve evidence, identify available insurance coverage, and document the financial and physical effects of the crash.
Our attorneys help car accident victims pursue a personal injury claim when another driver’s negligence caused injuries, lost income, medical expenses, or other compensable losses.
If you were injured in a rear-end wreck, you may have the right to pursue a personal injury claim against every person or business whose negligence caused or contributed to the crash.
Depending on the vehicles involved and the circumstances of the collision, liability may rest with the rear driver, another motorist, an employer, a vehicle owner, or another responsible party.
Your rights may include the right to:
An insurance company’s initial decision about fault or claim value does not determine your legal rights.
Photographs, witness statements, medical records, vehicle data, video, and other evidence can affect how responsibility is allocated and how much compensation may be available.
The rear driver is often at fault because every motorist must maintain enough distance to respond safely to traffic.
Colorado Revised Statutes section 42-4-1008 provides that a driver may not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, taking account of vehicle speed, traffic, and highway conditions.
Common reasons a rear driver may be negligent include:
For example, a driver who looks down at a text and strikes a vehicle stopped at a red light may be liable for the resulting injuries.
Phone records, an admission, dash-camera footage, witness testimony, and the damage pattern may support the claim.
No.
A rear-end impact is strong evidence that the following driver may have failed to keep a safe distance or lookout, but it does not make fault automatic.
Civil liability depends on the complete facts and whether each person used reasonable care.
The front driver may share or bear fault when evidence shows that the driver:
A mechanical failure, chain-reaction impact, roadway hazard, or third driver may also affect fault.
The decisive question is not simply which vehicle was struck from behind.
It is whose conduct caused or contributed to the collision.
A negligence-based rear-end car accident claim generally requires proof of duty, breach, causation, and damages.
The claimant must establish these elements by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning the claim is more likely true than not true.
Every driver must use reasonable care, keep a proper lookout, control the vehicle, and maintain a reasonable and prudent following distance.
The required distance changes with speed, traffic, visibility, road surface, weather, vehicle weight, and stopping ability.
A distance that may be adequate on a dry, open road may be unsafe during heavy traffic or snow.
The posted speed limit does not authorize a driver to travel faster than conditions safely permit.
A breach occurs when a driver acts less carefully than a reasonably prudent driver would under similar circumstances.
Following too closely, distracted driving, delayed braking, and excessive speed are common examples.
A traffic citation can support the claim, but it does not necessarily decide civil liability by itself.
The violation, disposition of the citation, admissibility rules, causation, and the remaining evidence must still be evaluated.
The claimant must connect the negligent driving to the collision and the collision to the injuries.
This usually requires both accident evidence and medical evidence.
Medical causation can become disputed when symptoms appeared later, imaging shows degenerative changes, or the injured person had prior neck or back problems.
Treatment records, prior records, physician opinions, diagnostic studies, and a consistent symptom timeline can distinguish a new injury from a preexisting condition or aggravation.
Damages are the losses caused by the collision.
Medical bills alone do not establish every category.
Wage records, treatment notes, photographs, receipts, expert opinions, and evidence of daily limitations may be needed to present the full effect of the injury.
Colorado follows a modified comparative negligence system for negligence claims arising from vehicle crashes.
An injured person can recover compensation when their own negligence is less than the negligence attributed to the defendant or, in cases involving multiple defendants, less than the combined negligence attributed to the defendants.
Any damages awarded are reduced according to the injured person’s percentage of fault.
In the modified comparative negligence system, if a person suffers $100,000 in damages from a rear-end collision claim and is found 20% at fault, the recoverable damages would be reduced to $80,000.
If the injured person is found 50% or more at fault, Colorado law generally bars recovery from the negligent defendant or defendants.
Comparative negligence can apply when both drivers contributed to the crash.
A rear driver may have followed too closely or failed to brake in time, while the front driver may have made an unsafe lane change, reversed unexpectedly, or committed another negligent act that contributed to the collision.
Photographs, video, witness statements, vehicle data, roadway evidence, and other records may be used to determine the percentage of fault assigned to each person.
Cases involving several responsible drivers or designated nonparties require a more detailed allocation of fault.
Colorado law generally assigns each defendant responsibility according to that defendant’s percentage of negligence or fault, subject to statutory exceptions.
Yes.
A rear-end crash may involve several responsible parties, particularly in a chain-reaction collision, commercial-vehicle accident, or mechanical-failure case.
Colorado generally allocates responsibility among parties according to their respective percentages of fault, subject to statutory exceptions and other liability doctrines.
Potentially responsible parties may include:
Identifying every responsible party matters when one driver has inadequate insurance or multiple injured people must share a per-accident limit.
Liability in a chain-reaction accident depends on the sequence of impacts and each driver’s conduct.
The last driver is not automatically responsible for every collision.
One driver may strike a vehicle and push it forward, or separate drivers may cause separate impacts.
Investigators may examine:
For example, if Driver C strikes Driver B and pushes B into Driver A, C may bear primary responsibility.
If B first struck A before C arrived, fault may be allocated differently.
Physical and electronic evidence can distinguish the sequences.
Rear-end crashes can cause injuries even when the vehicles remain drivable or exterior damage appears limited.
The forces transmitted to an occupant and the resulting injury do not always correspond directly to repair cost.
Common passenger and driver injuries include:
Whiplash is a neck injury caused by rapid back-and-forth movement of the head.
Rear-end collisions are a common mechanism.
Symptoms may include neck pain, stiffness, reduced range of motion, headaches, shoulder or upper-back pain, dizziness, fatigue, and tingling or numbness in the arms.
Symptoms can develop within hours or days rather than immediately at the scene.
Learn more about whiplash claims after a Colorado Springs car accident.
Yes.
A concussion can result from a blow to the head or a forceful impact to the body that causes the head and brain to move rapidly.
Loss of consciousness is not required.
Possible symptoms include headache, confusion, dizziness, nausea, light or noise sensitivity, memory problems, concentration difficulty, fatigue, sleep changes, and mood changes.
Worsening headache, repeated vomiting, seizure, significant weakness or numbness, decreased coordination, inability to awaken, or increasing confusion warrants urgent medical attention.
Protect your health first, then preserve evidence.
Even when the rear driver admits fault at the scene, the insurer may later dispute the account, injury causation, treatment, or damages.
Steps to take include:
Yes. Some injuries sustained in a rear-end collision may not cause immediate symptoms, particularly whiplash, soft tissue injuries, and certain forms of head trauma. Even minor injuries can worsen over the following hours or days and may develop into chronic pain without appropriate evaluation or treatment. Seek medical attention promptly if you develop pain, stiffness, headaches, dizziness, numbness, weakness, nausea, confusion, or other new symptoms after the crash. A medical evaluation can document when symptoms began, identify injuries that require treatment, and create a record connecting those conditions to the collision. Delaying care does not automatically defeat a claim, but an unexplained gap in treatment may make it more difficult to prove that the crash caused the injuries.
A strong rear-end accident claim uses evidence to prove the collision mechanism, identify each responsible party, connect the crash to the injuries, and document the resulting losses.
Evidence used to establish fault and prove negligence may include:
Evidence to prove damages may include:
Video and electronic data may be overwritten quickly.
A preservation request can be necessary before the information disappears.
No.
A police report may provide valuable facts and influence an adjuster’s initial decision, but it does not necessarily decide civil liability.
The investigating officer may not have witnessed the impact and may not have access to later-obtained video, electronic data, or expert analysis.
A report may contain driver statements, witness information, vehicle positions, contributing factors, diagrams, and citations.
If the report contains a material error, preserve contrary evidence and consider whether supplemental information should be provided to the investigating agency or insurer.
Not by itself.
A following-too-closely citation may support an argument that the rear driver failed to maintain a reasonable and prudent distance.
The claim still requires proof that the conduct caused the collision and that the collision caused compensable injuries or losses.
The citation’s disposition and the rules governing admissibility also matter.
An insurer, judge, or jury evaluates the complete body of evidence rather than treating a ticket as an automatic civil judgment.
An injured person may seek compensation for losses caused by the collision, subject to proof, comparative fault, insurance coverage, statutory rules, and the facts of the case.
Economic damages compensate for measurable financial losses.
Economic damages may include:
Non-economic damages compensate for losses that do not have a fixed invoice.
Non-economic damages may include:
Colorado law limits certain categories of damages.
The applicable limits can depend on the injury date, claim type, evidence, and statutory adjustments.
No generic settlement calculator can reliably determine an individual claim’s value.
Exemplary, or punitive, damages may be available only when the evidence meets Colorado’s heightened statutory standard, such as fraud, malice, or willful and wanton conduct.
They are not presumed in an ordinary rear-end accident and ordinarily require a specific procedure before being added to a lawsuit.
Evidence of extreme misconduct, including particularly dangerous impaired driving or deliberate road-rage conduct, may warrant further analysis.
Availability, proof, statutory limits, and insurance treatment are case-specific.
There is no standard rear-end accident settlement.
Claim value depends on the severity and duration of the injuries, objective medical findings, treatment, prognosis, permanent impairment, lost income, effect on daily life, liability evidence, comparative fault, insurance limits, and liens.
Factors that commonly affect value include:
A low vehicle repair estimate does not, by itself, establish that no bodily injury occurred.
The medical evidence and actual collision circumstances must be evaluated rather than relying on a single damage photograph or generalized assumption.
After a Colorado Springs car accident, multiple types of insurance coverage may apply depending on the circumstances of the crash and the available policies.
At-fault driver’s bodily injury liability coverage may compensate for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other injury-related damages, but fault generally must be established.
Property damage liability coverage may pay for vehicle repairs and personal property losses caused by the negligent driver.
Your own policy may also provide benefits, including medical payments coverage for medical expenses regardless of fault, collision coverage for vehicle damage subject to policy terms and deductibles, and uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage when the responsible driver lacks insurance or does not have enough coverage to fully compensate your losses.
In addition, health insurance may help cover medical treatment costs subject to the terms of the health plan.
Yes, if applicable MedPay coverage is available under the auto insurance policy.
Colorado automobile liability policies generally must include at least $5,000 in medical payments coverage unless the named insured rejects the coverage in writing or through the same medium used to apply for the policy.
MedPay can cover medically necessary, accident-related treatment without requiring a determination of who caused the crash.
Covered expenses may include ambulance services, emergency treatment, physician care, diagnostic testing, rehabilitation, and other qualifying medical care, subject to the policy limits and terms.
If an insurer cannot provide proof that MedPay was properly rejected, Colorado law presumes that the policy includes $5,000 in MedPay benefits.
Higher limits may also be available when the insured purchased additional coverage.
Uninsured motorist coverage may apply when the at-fault driver has no applicable liability insurance or in a qualifying hit-and-run.
Underinsured motorist coverage may apply when the driver has insurance but the available limits are insufficient to compensate for covered damages.
Colorado requires UM/UIM coverage to be included unless the named insured rejects it in writing.
Coverage eligibility, limits, priority among policies, exclusions, and claim procedures depend on the policy and facts.
A claimant should identify all personal, household, and occupied-vehicle policies before signing a liability release.
Yes.
Necessary medical care should not be delayed while liability is investigated.
Health insurance may pay covered treatment according to the plan’s deductibles, copays, network rules, and other terms.
The health insurer or benefit plan may later assert a lien, subrogation right, or reimbursement claim against settlement proceeds.
Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA plans, military benefits, and other payors follow different rules.
These interests should be identified and resolved before settlement funds are distributed.
Most claims proceed through investigation, medical documentation, insurance evaluation, demand, and negotiation.
A lawsuit becomes necessary when the claim cannot be resolved fairly or formal legal procedures are needed.
Notify the appropriate auto insurers and obtain claim numbers.
Provide accurate basic facts, but do not guess about speed, distance, diagnoses, or fault.
Review your policy duties before giving a recorded statement or signing an authorization.
Collect the police report, photographs, video, witness information, vehicle data, and repair documentation.
When a commercial vehicle, rideshare, defective component, or chain reaction is involved, additional parties and records may need to be investigated.
Medical records should explain the symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, restrictions, prognosis, and relationship to the collision.
Wage records, receipts, photographs, and evidence of functional limitations support other categories of loss.
When the medical condition and future needs can be evaluated responsibly, the claimant or attorney may submit a demand package.
It typically presents liability evidence, medical causation, treatment, economic losses, non-economic harm, coverage, and a settlement proposal.
The insurer may accept liability, allege comparative fault, dispute treatment, challenge preexisting conditions, or make an offer.
If negotiations do not produce a fair result, filing suit allows the parties to use interrogatories, document requests, depositions, subpoenas, expert testimony, motions, mediation, and trial.
Filing a lawsuit does not mean the case will necessarily reach trial.
Many cases settle after discovery clarifies fault, medical causation, insurance coverage, and damages.
It depends on which insurer is requesting the statement and your obligations under the applicable policy.
Your own insurer may have contractual cooperation rights.
The other driver’s insurer does not represent you and may use the statement to evaluate comparative fault, injury causation, prior conditions, and damages.
Do not guess about facts you did not observe, estimate speed without a basis, or minimize symptoms before the medical condition is understood.
Before agreeing, determine why the statement is requested, whether it is required, what topics will be covered, and whether representation is appropriate.
An insurer may argue that limited visible vehicle damage means the collision could not have caused the claimed injury.
That conclusion is not automatic.
Vehicle design, bumper height, impact angle, occupant position, prior conditions, restraint use, and other factors can affect force transmission and injury.
The response should rely on evidence rather than labels such as “minor impact.”
Relevant proof may include repair records, hidden structural damage, photographs, event data, treating-provider opinions, diagnostic findings, prior medical records, and, in an appropriate case, biomechanical or accident-reconstruction analysis.
A preexisting condition does not automatically bar recovery.
A negligent driver may be responsible for a new injury or for aggravating a prior condition.
The claimant must distinguish the pre-accident baseline from the post-accident symptoms and limitations.
Prior medical records may help show that a condition was stable, asymptomatic, or managed before the crash.
Post-accident records, imaging, physician opinions, treatment changes, and testimony about function can establish an aggravation.
Concealing prior treatment creates credibility problems; accurate disclosure permits a medically supported comparison.
A driver stopped lawfully at a red light ordinarily has a strong liability position.
The following driver must maintain control and enough distance to stop safely.
Photographs of the intersection, vehicle positions, damage, traffic signals, and any dash-camera footage can preserve the circumstances.
The insurer may still examine whether another vehicle caused a chain reaction, whether the front vehicle rolled backward, or whether another unusual event occurred.
A prompt, objective record reduces room for later factual disputes.
Snow and ice do not eliminate a driver’s duty to use reasonable care.
A motorist must adjust speed and following distance for reduced traction, visibility, and stopping ability.
Losing control may support negligence when the driver was traveling too fast for conditions or following too closely.
Weather data, scene photographs, tire condition, road treatment, witness accounts, and vehicle data may help determine whether the driver acted reasonably.
The analysis focuses on conduct under the actual conditions, not merely whether the posted speed limit was exceeded.
A commercial rear-end collision may involve the driver, motor carrier, employer, vehicle owner, maintenance company, loading contractor, or another business.
Commercial policies may provide greater coverage, but the investigation is also more complex.
Relevant evidence may include electronic logging records, engine-control data, telematics, inward- and outward-facing camera footage, dispatch messages, driver qualification files, inspection reports, maintenance records, hours-of-service information, and company safety policies.
Preservation demands should be sent promptly because retention periods vary.
A claim involving a city, county, state, public employee, transit vehicle, or other governmental entity may be subject to the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act.
In qualifying cases, written notice may be required within 182 days after discovery of the injury, in addition to the ordinary lawsuit deadline.
The notice must satisfy statutory content and delivery requirements.
Because the correct public entity may not be obvious from the vehicle or uniform, these claims require immediate investigation.
Colorado generally requires tort actions for bodily injury or property damage arising from the use or operation of a motor vehicle to be filed within three years after the claim accrues under Colorado Revised Statutes section 13-80-101(1)(n).
Missing the deadline may bar recovery even when fault appears clear.
Shorter notice periods and different rules may apply to government claims, wrongful death, minors, out-of-state parties, insurance-contract disputes, and other special circumstances.
Opening an insurance claim, exchanging records, or negotiating with an adjuster does not ordinarily stop the limitations period.
Evidence can disappear long before three years pass.
Video may be overwritten, vehicles repaired, electronic data lost, and witness memories fade.
The legal deadline is therefore not a recommended waiting period.
A claim should be settled only when liability, available insurance, current damages, and reasonably anticipated future losses can be evaluated with adequate information.
Settling too early may leave future treatment, impairment, or lost earning capacity uncompensated.
Before signing a release, confirm:
A valid release ordinarily ends the covered claims permanently, even if symptoms later worsen or additional treatment becomes necessary.
Several common mistakes can weaken the evidence or reduce the value of a rear-end accident claim:
A lawyer can build the liability and damages case independently rather than relying on an adjuster’s initial assessment.
Representation is particularly useful when fault is disputed, injuries may be permanent, several vehicles are involved, coverage is limited, or the insurer attributes symptoms to a prior condition.
A lawyer may help by:
Prompt legal review is particularly useful when the collision caused significant injury, symptoms continue, fault is disputed, multiple vehicles were involved, the at-fault driver lacks insurance, or a commercial or government vehicle was involved.
Early review also matters when an insurer requests a recorded statement, seeks broad medical records, claims the impact was too minor to cause injury, or offers payment before the prognosis is clear.
Evidence preservation cannot always wait until treatment is complete.
When one vehicle strikes another from behind, liability may appear straightforward, but rear-end accident claims often require a closer review of following distance, braking, vehicle movements, road conditions, and the conduct of both the rear driver and the lead driver.
Serious crashes can cause catastrophic injuries, while lower-speed collisions may still result in whiplash, back injuries, head injuries, and other conditions that require ongoing treatment.
Our attorneys investigate the collision, preserve available evidence, identify applicable insurance coverage, document medical and financial losses, and address disputes involving fault or injury causation.
We also evaluate whether another driver, employer, vehicle owner, commercial carrier, or other party may share responsibility for the crash.
Springs Law Group offers free consultations and handles qualifying personal injury cases on a contingency-fee basis.
Contact us today or use the chat feature on this page to speak with a Colorado Springs rear-end accident lawyer about your case.
Rear-end collisions can cause injuries ranging from temporary muscle strains to permanent injuries requiring surgery, rehabilitation, or long-term medical care.
The type and severity of the injuries depend on the force and direction of the impact, occupant position, restraint use, prior medical conditions, and other crash-specific factors.
Rear-impact research has documented whiplash and other cervical symptoms, while motor vehicle crashes can also cause serious spinal trauma.
Injuries may include:
Disc abnormalities require careful medical evaluation.
A herniated disc may be diagnosed after a collision, but whether a specific crash caused or aggravated the condition depends on the medical findings, prior history, and mechanics of the collision rather than the diagnosis alone.
Rear end collision damage is not limited to a visibly crushed bumper.
Photographs, repair inspections, estimates, and mechanical records can help document what happened to the vehicle and may also provide evidence concerning the direction and severity of the impact.
Document visible or newly noticed conditions such as:
Avoid assuming that a mechanical problem was caused by the collision without an inspection. Repair records and professional findings provide stronger evidence than appearance alone.
Safety and medical needs come first at the crash scene.
Colorado law requires a driver involved in a traffic accident resulting in injury, death, or any property damage to give immediate notice to the appropriate police authority after completing the required duties at the scene.
When it is safe to do so:
Avoid arguing about fault or guessing about speed, distance, or injuries at the scene.
There is no reliable statewide average for a rear end collision settlement in Colorado.
Claim value depends on the injuries, medical treatment, prognosis, lost income, physical impairment, pain and suffering, comparative fault, available insurance, and the strength of the evidence.
A claim involving temporary soft tissue symptoms may have a very different value from one involving surgery, permanent impairment, lost earning capacity, or catastrophic injury.
Complex cases can also take a year or longer when treatment continues, liability is disputed, several insurance policies are involved, or a personal injury lawsuit requires discovery and expert testimony.
Settlement should be evaluated from the documented facts of the individual case rather than a generic online settlement range.
NHTSA research has historically reported that rear-end collisions account for approximately 29% of all traffic crashes.
Rear-end crashes frequently involve a following vehicle encountering a stopped or slowing lead vehicle.
Weather can affect the amount of time and distance needed to avoid a collision. Rain can make pavement slick and increase stopping distance, while fog, snow, and other low-visibility conditions can make it harder to detect slowing traffic.
NHTSA advises drivers to reduce speed and increase following distance when roads are wet.
A driver may therefore be negligent even when traveling below the posted speed limit if the speed or following distance was unsafe for the actual conditions.
A personal injury lawsuit may become appropriate when an insurer denies liability, assigns unsupported fault to the injured person, disputes medical causation, undervalues significant damages, or refuses to make a reasonable settlement offer.
Filing suit also provides formal discovery procedures that can be used to obtain records, testimony, electronic data, and other evidence that may not be voluntarily produced during an insurance claim.
A lawsuit may be particularly important when several vehicles were involved, injuries are permanent, insurance coverage is disputed, or important evidence is controlled by another party.
Colorado generally applies a three-year limitations period to tort claims arising from the use or operation of a motor vehicle, although different deadlines can apply in particular circumstances.
Contacting a law firm may be appropriate when injuries require continuing treatment, fault is disputed, several drivers or insurance policies are involved, or the insurer questions whether the collision caused the reported injuries.
Legal review can also be useful when evidence at the crash scene may disappear, surveillance footage could be overwritten, or the damaged vehicle may be repaired before an inspection occurs.
More serious cases may require analysis of medical causation, future treatment, permanent injuries, lost earning capacity, insurance limits, and expert evidence.
An attorney can investigate both the rear driver and any other person or business whose conduct may have contributed to the collision, preserve available evidence, and evaluate whether settlement or litigation is appropriate.
Member of the Colorado Bar Association since 2014. Attorney, Christopher M. Nicolaysen focuses primarily on helping those injured in Colorado car accidents, other auto accidents, and Colorado personal injury incidents.
This article has been written and reviewed for legal accuracy and clarity by the team of writers and attorneys at Springs Law Group and is as accurate as possible. This content should not be taken as legal advice from an attorney. If you would like to learn more about our owner and experienced Colorado personal injury lawyer, Christopher Nicolaysen, you can do so here.
Springs Law Group does everything possible to make sure the information in this article is up to date and accurate. If you need specific legal advice about your case, contact us. This article should not be taken as advice from an attorney.
We use reviews to help show more people like you why we do what we do!
I was uneasy about reaching out to a law firm after being in an accident that left me injured and my vehicle totaled. I don’t care for the idea of suing for what was very clearly an accident. However, after learning more about the overall process of working with a professional team to navigate the murky waters of the insurance world, I was pleasantly surprised to find that the experience wasn’t as gross as I’d originally felt about it.
Springs Law is very friendly and professional. I always felt that they were on my side and cared about my injury and what I was going through. I highly recommend them.
Springs Law Group is an amazing group to work with! I got into a rough accident, and they never ceased to let me know they were there working hard to help me in my hour of need. It was always very easy to reach out to someone if I had any questions, and they were always happy to answer any questions I had.
I never have a problem with getting a response when I need them – which is not the case with most other firms. They really truly care about each client. As a plus, they always have positive attitudes, which matters tremendously when you are in a stressful legal situation.
Big thanks to Mr. Jake Kimbell and his team for their assistance with my case. He helped me through an incredibly challenging part of my life, and most importantly helped navigate through the convoluted legal channels of my case. I cannot thank him and his team enough for their support.
The entire team at Springs Law group has been nothing but amazing. Jake and the rest of the staff were great to work with and extremely professional. They were very attentive and answered any questions and concerns I had. I was always able to contact them and they were very responsive and communicated with me.
Springs Law Group is an amazing group to work with! I got into a rough accident, and they never ceased to let me know they were there working hard to help me in my hour of need. It was always very easy to reach out to someone if I had any questions, and they were always happy to answer any questions I had.
