Colorado Springs Comparative Negligence Lawyer

What is Comparative Negligence in Colorado?

Comparative negligence is a legal concept used to assign fault in personal injury cases in Colorado.

There are two types of comparative negligence: pure comparative negligence and modified comparative negligence.

The pure comparative negligence rule is a system where a plaintiff can recover damages even if found to be mostly at fault for the accident.

The damages are reduced by the plaintiff’s percentage of fault.

Modified comparative negligence, on the other hand, limits a plaintiff’s ability to recover damages if they are partially at fault for the accident.

The modified comparative negligence rule in Colorado is known as the “50% rule.”

A plaintiff can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%.

If the plaintiff’s percentage of fault is greater, they are barred from recovering damages.

Contributory Negligence Vs. Comparative Negligence Rules

Contributory and comparative negligence are two legal terms used to describe situations where multiple parties are at fault for an accident.

However, there are significant differences between the two concepts.

In states that follow the contributory negligence rule, if an injured person is found to be partially responsible for an accident, they may not recover any damages.

For example:

• If Driver A is injured when Driver B changes lanes abruptly and is found to be at fault for not signaling and not looking before changing lanes, but Driver A was not paying attention to the road, Driver A would be unable to collect any damages from Driver B.
• Similarly, a pedestrian hit by a car in a contributory negligence state may not have any recourse against the driver if the pedestrian was not paying attention to their surroundings or was violating traffic laws.

In contrast, in a comparative negligence state, the actions of both parties are examined, and a judge or jury determines the relative fault of each.

If an injured party is found to be partially at fault in a car accident, they may still recover damages, but the jury may reduce the amount.

Colorado Negligence Laws

Colorado’s modified comparative negligence statute provides that a person may recover damages in proportion to the degree of the plaintiff’s negligence and the defendant’s.

The judge or jury is instructed first to determine the number of damages that would be awarded if there were no negligence on the part of the injured party.

Then, the judge or jury must determine the relative fault of each party.

The amount awarded is the total amount minus an amount equal to the degree of fault assigned to the injured party.

If it is found that the injured party’s fault is more than 50%, they will receive nothing, the rationale being that a person should not be able to recover damages if he was mostly responsible for his own injuries.

Joint Liability

If there is more than one defendant in an accident case, the 50% rule still applies, but the relative negligence of the injured party is measured against all of the defendants, not each individually.

For example:

• Suppose Defendant A is found to be 70% responsible, Defendant B is found to be 10% responsible, and the injured party is found to be 20% responsible. In that case, the injured party may still be awarded damages, even though his degree of responsibility may have been less than that of Defendant B.

Sometimes, defendants in accident injury cases will argue that some other person, not one of the parties to the lawsuit, bore some of the responsibility for the accident.

If the defendant can establish that a non-party was partially at fault, their liability may be reduced.

Accident cases involving multiple defendants, and those in which comparative negligence is an issue, are complex and require attorneys willing and able to go to court when needed.

At Springs Law Group, we try to settle each case if possible, but when we cannot reach a fair settlement, we are fearless in taking on even the most complex case.

“Last Clear Chance” Doctrine

The doctrine of “last clear chance” is another means of assigning fault in an accident.

If the injured person was partially at fault, but the defendant still had a chance to avoid the accident, the injured person may still recover.

Insurance companies are always looking for ways to minimize the amounts they must pay, and trying to assign blame to the injured person is one way they may use to do that.

Whenever there is any question of who was at fault for an accident, it is important to talk to a comparative negligence attorney in Colorado Springs immediately.

If you inadvertently say something that might be interpreted as a partial admission of fault, your right to recover for your injuries may be reduced.

Even something as innocuous as “I should have seen him coming” might be used by an insurance company to assign part of the blame to you, ultimately reducing the amount you might collect.

Proving Negligence in a Personal Injury Case

Proving negligence is a critical element of a personal injury case.

To win your case, you must demonstrate that the other party was negligent and that their negligence caused your injuries.

Here are four key elements to consider when trying to prove negligence in a personal injury case:

1. Duty of care — The first step in proving negligence is demonstrating that the defendant owed you a duty of care. This means they had a responsibility to take reasonable steps to prevent harm.
2. Breach of duty — Demonstrate that the defendant breached their duty of care. This means that they failed to take reasonable steps to prevent harm from occurring.
3. Causation — You must show that this breach caused your injuries. Your injuries would not have occurred if the defendant had not been negligent.
4. Damages — Finally, you must demonstrate that you suffered damages due to the defendant’s negligence. This can include physical injuries, emotional distress, and financial losses.

Proving negligence in a personal injury case can be complex, and working with an experienced personal injury attorney who can guide you through the process is important.

A skilled attorney can help you gather evidence, build a strong case, and fight for the compensation you deserve.

Contact a personal injury attorney at Springs Law Group today to learn more.

Contact a Colorado Springs Comparative Negligence Lawyer

Are you facing a legal situation where you may be partially at fault for an accident?

Don’t make the costly mistake of assuming you have no recourse.

The Colorado Springs comparative negligence lawyers at Springs Law Group can help you understand your options and fight for the compensation you deserve.

With years of experience representing clients in Colorado Springs and beyond, our team has the knowledge and expertise to navigate the complexities of comparative negligence cases.

We understand the nuances of state laws and can work tirelessly to build a strong case on your behalf.

Don’t let comparative negligence laws in Colorado Springs reduce your compensation.

Trust the skilled attorneys at Springs Law Group to fight for your rights and future.

Contact us today to learn more.

FAQ: Colorado Springs Comparative Negligence

What is the 50 percent rule of comparative negligence?

The 50 percent rule of comparative negligence states that a plaintiff cannot recover damages if they are found to be 50% or more at fault for the accident.

This rule is followed in many states, including Colorado.

Who has the burden of proof in comparative negligence?

In a comparative negligence case, the burden of proof falls on the plaintiff.

The plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant was negligent and that this negligence caused their injuries.

How do you calculate comparative negligence?

To calculate comparative negligence, the court will determine the percentage of fault for each party involved in the accident.

This is typically done by looking at the actions of each party leading up to the accident.